Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stephney v. Columbus County, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Wade Stephney, Jr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-12-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7510

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Wade Stephney, Jr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views2 pages

    Stephney v. Columbus County, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Wade Stephney, Jr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7510

    WADE STEPHNEY, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COLUMBUS
    CENTER,

    COUNTY;

    COLUMBUS

    COUNTY

    DETENTION
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00606-FL)

    Submitted:

    December 14, 2006

    Decided:

    December 21, 2006

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wade Stephney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr.,
    WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
    Carolina, Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE,
    PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wade Stephney, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Stephney v. Columbus County, No. 5:05-ct-

    00606-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like