Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Moses v. Ham, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    An unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed as frivolous an appeal by Edward L. Moses, a North Carolina inmate, of a district court order dismissing his civil rights claim regarding the prison grievance procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-12-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7298

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    An unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed as frivolous an appeal by Edward L. Moses, a North Carolina inmate, of a district court order dismissing his civil rights claim regarding the prison grievance procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Moses v. Ham, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    An unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed as frivolous an appeal by Edward L. Moses, a North Carolina inmate, of a district court order dismissing his civil rights claim regarding the prison grievance procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7298

    EDWARD L. MOSES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT HAM; BELINDA DUDLEY; MICHAEL A. HARDEE;
    MICHAEL J. LAMM; FINESSE G. COUCH,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:07-ct-03082)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2007

    Decided:

    December 20, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward L. Moses, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward L. Moses, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the
    district courts order dismissing his civil rights claim regarding
    the grievance procedure under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We
    have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
    district court.

    Moses v. Ham, No. 5:07-ct-03082 (E.D.N.C. filed

    Aug. 15, 2007; entered Aug. 16, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like