Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Michael Moore, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Michael Moore appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Moore's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7008

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Moore appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Moore's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Michael Moore, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Moore appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Moore's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7008

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1)

    Submitted:

    November 2, 2012

    Decided:

    November 7, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.


    Thomas More Hollenhorst,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Shane Neel Cralle, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael L. Moore appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his
    sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1

    (E.D. Va. May 18, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like