Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jake Hendrix v. State, 4th Cir. (2015)
Jake Hendrix v. State, 4th Cir. (2015)
No. 15-6675
JAKE HENDRIX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DIRECTOR MICHAEL MOORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge.
(4:14-cv-00971-JMC)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Jake Hendrix seeks to appeal the district courts order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2012) petition.
The
28
U.S.C.
636(b)(1)(B)
(2012).
The
magistrate
judge
review
of
district
court
order
based
upon
the
recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judges recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been
warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Wright v. Collins,
766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140 (1985).
to
file
specific
after
receiving
proper
notice.