Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Foust v. Stouffer, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Pennell Norman Foust appealed a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court denied Foust's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6066

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Pennell Norman Foust appealed a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court denied Foust's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Foust v. Stouffer, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Pennell Norman Foust appealed a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court denied Foust's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6066

    PENNELL NORMAN FOUST,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL
    FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-00-3499-AW)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 18, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Pennell Norman Foust, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Pennell Foust appeals the district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny the

    motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court. Foust v. Stouffer, No. CA-003499-AW (D. Md. filed Dec. 4, 2000; entered Dec. 6, 2000).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like