Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Betemit, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Albert Betemit's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Betemit, No. 3:95-cr-00064-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2010). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-12-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7048

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Albert Betemit's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Betemit, No. 3:95-cr-00064-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2010). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Betemit, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Albert Betemit's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Betemit, No. 3:95-cr-00064-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2010). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7048

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ALBERT BETEMIT, a/k/a Juan Lopez, a/k/a Jose Ivan Torres,
    a/k/a Jose Frias,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:95-cr-00064-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2010

    Before SHEDD and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    and

    December 1, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Albert Betemit, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Albert

    Betemit

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Betemit,

    No.

    3:95-cr-00064-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2010).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like