Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stephen McLees v. Dr. Moja, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Stephen McLees filed a § 1983 complaint against Dr. Moja, a jail physician. The district court denied relief to McLees. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to McLees. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6481

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Stephen McLees filed a § 1983 complaint against Dr. Moja, a jail physician. The district court denied relief to McLees. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to McLees. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Stephen McLees v. Dr. Moja, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Stephen McLees filed a § 1983 complaint against Dr. Moja, a jail physician. The district court denied relief to McLees. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to McLees. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6481

    STEPHEN MCLEES,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    DR. MOJA, Physician/Jail Doctor,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-00195-JCC-TCB)

    Submitted:

    May 10, 2012

    Decided:

    May 25, 2012

    Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stephen McLees, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stephen

    McLees

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    McLees

    Mar. 7, 2012).

    v.

    Moja,

    No.

    1:12-cv-00195-JCC-TCB

    (E.D.

    Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like