Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kenneth Mitchell v. South Carolina, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Kenneth Ray Mitchell filed a § 1983 complaint against South Carolina and Richland County. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Mitchell appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-07-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6612

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kenneth Ray Mitchell filed a § 1983 complaint against South Carolina and Richland County. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Mitchell appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Kenneth Mitchell v. South Carolina, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Ray Mitchell filed a § 1983 complaint against South Carolina and Richland County. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Mitchell appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6612

    KENNETH RAY MITCHELL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SC, STATE OF; RICHLAND CO, all ect,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (3:12-cv-00153-CMC)

    Submitted:

    July 19, 2012

    Decided:

    July 26, 2012

    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kenneth Ray Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth

    Ray

    Mitchell

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Mitchell v. S.C., No. 3:12-cv-00153-CMC (D.S.C. Mar. 9,

    2012).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like