Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rankins v. Bonner, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Michael Rankins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants that was denied by the district court. Rankins appealed pro se. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6910

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Rankins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants that was denied by the district court. Rankins appealed pro se. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Rankins v. Bonner, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Rankins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants that was denied by the district court. Rankins appealed pro se. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6910

    MICHAEL RANKINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GREGORY
    BONNER;
    STOP
    SHOP
    STORE;
    SOTIROPOLOS; BRENDA K. SPRUILL,

    JOHN
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-303-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    August 15, 2002

    Decided:

    August 26, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael Rankins, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Rankins appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. See Rankins v. Bonner, No. CA-02-303-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
    June 10, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like