Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Billups v. Edwards, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Waymare Billups filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Walter G. Edwards Jr. in district court that was denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Billups appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning that Billups' complaint did not state a claim. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit does not serve as binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7545

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Waymare Billups filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Walter G. Edwards Jr. in district court that was denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Billups appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning that Billups' complaint did not state a claim. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit does not serve as binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Billups v. Edwards, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Waymare Billups filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Walter G. Edwards Jr. in district court that was denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Billups appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning that Billups' complaint did not state a claim. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit does not serve as binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7545

    WAYMARE BILLUPS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WALTER G. EDWARDS, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-663-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2002

    Decided:

    December 23, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Waymare Billups, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Waymare Billups appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district

    See

    court.

    Billups

    (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2002).

    v.

    Edwards,

    No.

    CA-02-663-5-BO

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like