Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Billups v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Waymare Billups filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck, Boyd Bennett, and Ernest Sutton that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Billups appealed the denial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial on the same reasoning. As the opinion is unpublished, it does not constitute binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7430

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Waymare Billups filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck, Boyd Bennett, and Ernest Sutton that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Billups appealed the denial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial on the same reasoning. As the opinion is unpublished, it does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Billups v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Waymare Billups filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck, Boyd Bennett, and Ernest Sutton that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Billups appealed the denial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial on the same reasoning. As the opinion is unpublished, it does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7430

    WAYMARE BILLUPS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THEODIS BECK; BOYD BENNETT; ERNEST SUTTON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-628-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2002

    Decided:

    December 20, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Waymare Billups, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Waymare Billups appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Billups v. Beck, No. CA-02-628-5-BO (E.D.N.C.

    Sept. 12, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like