Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lytle v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Hubert Lytle appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the reasoning of the district court in denying Lytle's petition. The Fourth Circuit also granted Lytle's request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6878

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Hubert Lytle appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the reasoning of the district court in denying Lytle's petition. The Fourth Circuit also granted Lytle's request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lytle v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Hubert Lytle appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the reasoning of the district court in denying Lytle's petition. The Fourth Circuit also granted Lytle's request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6878

    HUBERT LYTLE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-02-326-3)

    Submitted:

    September 5, 2002

    Decided:

    September 10, 2002

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Hubert Lytle, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Hubert Lytle appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) petition.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    Lytle v. Brooks, No. CA-02-326-3 (E.D. Va. June 4, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like