Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Maree-Bey v. Nash, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Thomas Maree-Bey's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning that Maree-Bey must complete the administrative exhaustion process for issues that arose during his confinement before pursuing his claim in federal court, even though he has since been paroled from custody. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7419

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Thomas Maree-Bey's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning that Maree-Bey must complete the administrative exhaustion process for issues that arose during his confinement before pursuing his claim in federal court, even though he has since been paroled from custody. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Maree-Bey v. Nash, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Thomas Maree-Bey's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning that Maree-Bey must complete the administrative exhaustion process for issues that arose during his confinement before pursuing his claim in federal court, even though he has since been paroled from custody. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7419

    THOMAS E. MAREE-BEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN NASH, Warden, FCI Schuylkill,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA02-2584-CCB)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2002

    Decided:

    December 16, 2002

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Thomas E. Maree-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas E. Maree-Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).
    reversible error.
    district court.*

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Maree-Bey v. Nash, No. CA-02-2584-CCB (D. Md.

    filed Sept. 10, 2002 & entered Sept. 11, 2002).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Maree-Bey suggests in his informal brief to this court that


    he is unable to complete administrative exhaustion of his claim
    because he has been paroled from custody. However, the applicable
    regulations apply to former inmates for issues that arose during
    their confinement.
    28 C.F.R. 542.10(b) (2002).
    Therefore,
    Maree-Bey must complete the exhaustion process before pursuing his
    claim in federal court.
    2

    You might also like