Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McPhail v. Raynor, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    Dexter McPhail filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Rhonda Raynor and Norman Wayne Naylor that was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision without hearing oral arguments. Unpublished opinions by the Fourth Circuit, such as this one, do not serve as binding legal precedent. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6607

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dexter McPhail filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Rhonda Raynor and Norman Wayne Naylor that was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision without hearing oral arguments. Unpublished opinions by the Fourth Circuit, such as this one, do not serve as binding legal precedent. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    20 views2 pages

    McPhail v. Raynor, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dexter McPhail filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Rhonda Raynor and Norman Wayne Naylor that was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision without hearing oral arguments. Unpublished opinions by the Fourth Circuit, such as this one, do not serve as binding legal precedent. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6607

    DEXTER MCPHAIL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RHONDA RAYNOR; NORMAN WAYNE NAYLOR,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever, III,
    District Judge. (5:07-ct-03024-D)

    Submitted: June 21, 2007

    Decided:

    June 29, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dexter McPhail, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dexter

    McPhail

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) for


    failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    McPhail v.

    Raynor, No. 5:07-ct-03024-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2007).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like