Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crews, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Michael Crews appealed the district court's denial of his motion to waive a fine related to his 2000 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's rulings. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Crews' motion to waive the fine and his subsequent motion to reconsider that denial. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6714

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Crews appealed the district court's denial of his motion to waive a fine related to his 2000 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's rulings. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Crews' motion to waive the fine and his subsequent motion to reconsider that denial. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Crews, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Crews appealed the district court's denial of his motion to waive a fine related to his 2000 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's rulings. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Crews' motion to waive the fine and his subsequent motion to reconsider that denial. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6714

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL EARL CREWS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:00-cr-00087-2H)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2008

    Decided:

    June 26, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Earl Crews, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Earl Crews appeals the district courts orders
    denying his Renewed Motion to Waive Fine and his motion to
    reconsider that denial.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    United States v. Crews, No. 5:00-cr-00087-2H

    (E.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 2006 & Dec. 8, 2006).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    -2-

    You might also like