Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Anthony Snipe, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Anthony Lamar Snipe appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-8073

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anthony Lamar Snipe appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Anthony Snipe, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anthony Lamar Snipe appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-8073

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
    District Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2013

    Decided: March 1, 2013

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant


    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Charleston,
    South
    Carolina,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence
    reduction.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Snipe, No. 2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1

    (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like