Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Steglich, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Lance Bishop Steglich appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his "Independent Action Motion for Reconsideration Writ of Habeas Corpus." The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated, that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and oral argument was not necessary. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7091

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lance Bishop Steglich appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his "Independent Action Motion for Reconsideration Writ of Habeas Corpus." The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated, that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and oral argument was not necessary. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Steglich, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lance Bishop Steglich appealed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his "Independent Action Motion for Reconsideration Writ of Habeas Corpus." The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated, that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and oral argument was not necessary. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7091

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LANCE BISHOP STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District
    Judge. (3:00-cr-00063-JHM; 7:06-cv-00055-JPJ)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2006

    Decided:

    January 8, 2007

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lance Bishop Steglich, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lance Bishop Steglich appeals the district courts order
    dismissing
    Independent

    without
    Action

    prejudice
    Motion

    his

    for

    pleading

    captioned

    Reconsideration

    Writ

    as

    of

    An

    Habeas

    Corpus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court. United States v. Steglich, Nos. 3:00-cr-00063-JHM; 7:06-cv00055-JPJ (W.D. Va. May 3, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like