Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kenneth Newkirk v. William Shaw, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kenneth Newkirk's § 1983 complaint against Judge William Shaw, lawyer Kevin Sha, and lawyer Carter Phillips. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7260

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kenneth Newkirk's § 1983 complaint against Judge William Shaw, lawyer Kevin Sha, and lawyer Carter Phillips. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Kenneth Newkirk v. William Shaw, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kenneth Newkirk's § 1983 complaint against Judge William Shaw, lawyer Kevin Sha, and lawyer Carter Phillips. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7260

    KENNETH H. NEWKIRK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WILLIAM SHAW, Judge/Try Cases; KEVIN P. SHA, Lawyer/Suppose
    to Defend Accusers; CARTER PHILLIPS, Lawyer/Suppose to
    Defend,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2014

    Decided:

    November 21, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth H. Newkirk appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint with prejudice
    under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)
    (2012).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district
    (E.D.

    Va.

    court.
    Aug.

    Newkirk
    19,

    2014).

    v.

    Shaw,
    We

    No.

    dispense

    3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL
    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like