Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kevin Horsey, Sr. v. Salisbury Police Department, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Kevin Horsey appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action without prejudice. The district court concluded Horsey's claims for damages were barred by Heck v. Humphrey and that his claims for injunctive relief were not otherwise cognizable. 2) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit confined its review to the issues raised in Horsey's informal brief. Horsey did not challenge the basis for the district court's order. 3) Because Horsey forfeited appellate review of the district court's disposition, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6202

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Kevin Horsey appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action without prejudice. The district court concluded Horsey's claims for damages were barred by Heck v. Humphrey and that his claims for injunctive relief were not otherwise cognizable. 2) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit confined its review to the issues raised in Horsey's informal brief. Horsey did not challenge the basis for the district court's order. 3) Because Horsey forfeited appellate review of the district court's disposition, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Kevin Horsey, Sr. v. Salisbury Police Department, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Kevin Horsey appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action without prejudice. The district court concluded Horsey's claims for damages were barred by Heck v. Humphrey and that his claims for injunctive relief were not otherwise cognizable. 2) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit confined its review to the issues raised in Horsey's informal brief. Horsey did not challenge the basis for the district court's order. 3) Because Horsey forfeited appellate review of the district court's disposition, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6202

    KEVIN RASHAAN HORSEY, SR.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    SALISBURY
    POLICE
    DEPARTMENT;
    B.
    CATON,
    Officer;
    N.
    AMENDOLAGINE, Officer; DAVID UNDERWOOD, Officer; DRUG TASK
    FORCE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-00147-ELH)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2014

    Decided:

    June 3, 2014

    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin Rashaan Horsey, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin
    courts

    order

    Rashaan

    Horsey,

    dismissing

    his

    Sr.,

    civil

    appeals

    action

    the

    district

    without

    prejudice

    after concluding that his claims for damages were barred by Heck
    v.

    Humphrey,

    512

    U.S.

    477

    (1994),

    and

    that

    his

    injunctive relief were not otherwise cognizable.


    confine

    our

    brief.

    See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

    does

    not

    legal
    before

    Horsey

    order.

    judgment.

    to

    challenge

    disposition,
    courts

    review

    the

    the
    has

    issues

    raised

    for

    On appeal, we
    the

    Appellants

    Because Horseys informal brief

    basis

    for

    forfeited

    Accordingly,

    in

    claims

    we

    the

    district

    appellate

    affirm

    the

    courts

    review

    of

    district

    the

    courts

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like