Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Nathaniel Rice V., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Nathaniel Dante Rice filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking immediate release after the district court vacated his sentence on his § 2255 motion. The court denied the petition as moot because the district court resentenced Rice and released him from imprisonment. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1973

    Original Title

    In Re: Nathaniel Rice v., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nathaniel Dante Rice filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking immediate release after the district court vacated his sentence on his § 2255 motion. The court denied the petition as moot because the district court resentenced Rice and released him from imprisonment. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    In Re: Nathaniel Rice V., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nathaniel Dante Rice filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking immediate release after the district court vacated his sentence on his § 2255 motion. The court denied the petition as moot because the district court resentenced Rice and released him from imprisonment. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1973

    In re:

    NATHANIEL DANTE RICE,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    January 15, 2015

    (1:02-cr-00153-JAB-1)

    Decided:

    January 20, 2015

    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nathaniel Dante Rice, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathaniel Dante Rice petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    seeking immediate release from imprisonment after the district
    court vacated Rices sentence upon his 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012)
    motion.
    the

    Our review of the district courts docket reveals that

    district

    released.

    court

    held

    resentencing

    hearing

    argument

    adequately

    Rice

    was

    Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.

    We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.


    oral

    and

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like