Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alvia Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    29 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Alvia L. Lacy appealed a district court ruling denying her claims of employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII against National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Larry Taylor. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, granting Lacy in forma pauperis status but affirming the district court's reasons for denying relief in Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014). The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1013

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Alvia L. Lacy appealed a district court ruling denying her claims of employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII against National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Larry Taylor. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, granting Lacy in forma pauperis status but affirming the district court's reasons for denying relief in Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014). The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    29 views2 pages

    Alvia Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Alvia L. Lacy appealed a district court ruling denying her claims of employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII against National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Larry Taylor. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, granting Lacy in forma pauperis status but affirming the district court's reasons for denying relief in Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014). The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1013

    ALVIA L. LACY,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    NATIONAL
    TAYLOR,

    RAILROAD

    PASSENGER

    CORPORATION,

    Amtrak;

    LARRY

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-00179-RDB)

    Submitted:

    April 16, 2015

    Decided:

    April 21, 2015

    Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alvia L. Lacy, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J.


    Delany, Andrew George Sakallaris, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP,
    Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alvia L. Lacy appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) and Title
    VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
    2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. 2000e (2012).
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    Accordingly,

    although

    pauperis,

    affirm

    court.

    we

    we
    for

    and
    grant

    the

    find

    no

    reversible

    leave

    to

    proceed

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We

    error.

    in

    forma

    district

    Lacy v. Natl R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179-

    RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like