Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Hunt v. Yasmin Grady, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    1) Michael Hunt appealed the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Yasmin Grady and denying his motion for reconsideration. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7637

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Michael Hunt appealed the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Yasmin Grady and denying his motion for reconsideration. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Michael Hunt v. Yasmin Grady, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Michael Hunt appealed the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Yasmin Grady and denying his motion for reconsideration. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7637

    MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    YASMIN GRADY, Officer,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Robert J. Conrad,
    Jr., District Judge. (5:12-cv-00144-RJC)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2015

    Decided:

    April 27, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Eugene Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.


    Peter Andrew Regulski,
    Assistant Attorney General, Jodi Harrison, NORTH CAROLINA
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael
    denying

    Eugene

    relief

    on

    Hunt
    his

    appeals

    42

    U.S.C.

    the

    district

    1983

    denying his motion for reconsideration.


    record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    (2012)

    complaint

    Accordingly, we affirm for


    Hunt v. Grady, No.

    5:12-cv-00144-RJC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 27, 2014).


    motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    We have reviewed the

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    oral

    orders

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Hunts

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like