Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Martin v. William Byars, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Anthony Fred Martin appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against William Byars and Donald Lane. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision. 3) Because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral argument was not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6194

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Anthony Fred Martin appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against William Byars and Donald Lane. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision. 3) Because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Anthony Martin v. William Byars, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Anthony Fred Martin appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against William Byars and Donald Lane. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's decision. 3) Because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6194

    ANTHONY FRED MARTIN,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    WILLIAM BYARS; DONALD LANE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (4:13-cv-03179-DCN)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2015

    Decided: May 22, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade,


    DOYLE, OROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony

    Fred

    Martin

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2012)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Martin

    v. Byars, No. 4:13-cv-03179-DCN (D.S.C. filed Jan. 29 & entered


    Jan. 30, 2015).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like