Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Martin v. Officer Blinkley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Fred Martin's § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-02-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7694

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Fred Martin's § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Anthony Martin v. Officer Blinkley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Fred Martin's § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7694

    ANTHONY FRED MARTIN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    OFFICER C. BLINKLEY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (4:13-cv-01568-DCN)

    Submitted:

    February 19, 2014

    Decided:

    February 21, 2014

    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district courts order
    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate

    judge

    and

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Martin v. Blinkley, No. 4:13-cv-01568-

    DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2013).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like