Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Anthony McQueen V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Anthony McQueen filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his Rule 60(b) motion in his 28 U.S.C. 2255 proceeding. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that the district court had ruled on McQueen's motion on November 1, 2013. Therefore, the mandamus petition was denied as moot. The court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-2066

    Original Title

    In Re: Anthony McQueen v., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anthony McQueen filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his Rule 60(b) motion in his 28 U.S.C. 2255 proceeding. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that the district court had ruled on McQueen's motion on November 1, 2013. Therefore, the mandamus petition was denied as moot. The court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    In Re: Anthony McQueen V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anthony McQueen filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his Rule 60(b) motion in his 28 U.S.C. 2255 proceeding. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that the district court had ruled on McQueen's motion on November 1, 2013. Therefore, the mandamus petition was denied as moot. The court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-2066

    In re:

    ANTHONY MCQUEEN,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (Nos. 1:04-cr-00257-CMH-1; 1:09-cv-00242-CMH)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2013

    Decided:

    November 25, 2013

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony McQueen, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony

    McQueen

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus,

    alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on


    his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255
    (West Supp. 2013) proceeding.
    directing

    the

    district

    court

    He seeks an order from this court


    to

    act.

    After

    reviewing

    the

    district courts docket, we confirmed that the district court


    ruled on McQueens motion on November 1, 2013.
    deny the mandamus petition as moot.
    in forma pauperis.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we

    We grant leave to proceed

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like