Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: McClaren V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Wenley McClaren filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his motion for a reduction of sentence. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition as moot, noting that the district court had recently decided McClaren's motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-02-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7194

    Original Title

    In re: McClaren v., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wenley McClaren filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his motion for a reduction of sentence. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition as moot, noting that the district court had recently decided McClaren's motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    In Re: McClaren V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wenley McClaren filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his motion for a reduction of sentence. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition as moot, noting that the district court had recently decided McClaren's motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7194

    In Re:

    WENLEY MCCLAREN,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (3:90-cr-00007-WCB)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2007

    Decided:

    February 16, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wenley McClaren, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wenley McClaren petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging
    the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Motion for
    Reduction of Sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing
    the district court to act. Because the district court has recently
    decided McClarens motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like