Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Kalvin Marshall V., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The petitioner, Kalvin Marshall, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his civil action. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently entered a final order denying relief. As a result, the appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now acted on the civil case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1232

    Original Title

    In re: Kalvin Marshall v., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner, Kalvin Marshall, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his civil action. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently entered a final order denying relief. As a result, the appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now acted on the civil case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    In Re: Kalvin Marshall V., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The petitioner, Kalvin Marshall, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his civil action. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had recently entered a final order denying relief. As a result, the appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now acted on the civil case. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1232

    In re:

    KALVIN MARSHALL,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (3:13-cv-00286-JRS)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2015

    Decided:

    May 26, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kalvin Marshall, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kalvin Marshall petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
    that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil
    action.

    He

    seeks

    an

    order

    district

    court

    to

    act.

    Our

    from

    this

    review

    of

    court
    the

    directing

    district

    the

    courts

    docket reveals that the district court recently entered a final


    order

    denying

    relief.

    petition as moot.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly,

    we

    deny

    the

    mandamus

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like