Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Vivek Shah V., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Vivek Shah filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Shah's petition, concluding that the district court record did not reveal any undue delay. While allowing Shah to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the mandamus petition without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2361

    Original Title

    In Re: Vivek Shah v., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vivek Shah filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Shah's petition, concluding that the district court record did not reveal any undue delay. While allowing Shah to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the mandamus petition without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    In Re: Vivek Shah V., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vivek Shah filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Shah's petition, concluding that the district court record did not reveal any undue delay. While allowing Shah to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the mandamus petition without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2361

    In Re:

    VIVEK SHAH,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (5:15-cv-07542)

    Submitted:

    March 3, 2016

    Before NIEMEYER
    Circuit Judge.

    and

    KING,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    March 15, 2016

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Vivek Shah, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that
    the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.
    2255

    (2012)

    directing
    present
    court.

    the

    record

    motion.

    He

    seeks

    district

    court

    to

    does

    not

    reveal

    an

    order

    from

    act.

    We

    conclude

    undue

    delay

    in

    this

    the

    court

    that

    the

    district

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like