Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: David Hill V., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied David Hill's petition for a writ of mandamus. Hill alleged that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his April 2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment. However, the Court of Appeals found that the record did not reveal undue delay by the district court. The Court denied Hill's petition and dispensed with oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1488

    Original Title

    In re: David Hill v., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied David Hill's petition for a writ of mandamus. Hill alleged that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his April 2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment. However, the Court of Appeals found that the record did not reveal undue delay by the district court. The Court denied Hill's petition and dispensed with oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    In Re: David Hill V., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied David Hill's petition for a writ of mandamus. Hill alleged that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his April 2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment. However, the Court of Appeals found that the record did not reveal undue delay by the district court. The Court denied Hill's petition and dispensed with oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1488

    In re:

    DAVID HILL,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

    Submitted:

    September 9, 2015

    Decided:

    September 11, 2015

    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that
    the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on Hills April
    2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment.

    He seeks an

    order from this court directing the district court to act.


    find

    the

    present

    district court.

    record

    does

    not

    reveal

    undue

    delay

    in

    We
    the

    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis and deny the mandamus petition.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like