Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Michael Monzel, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Michael Monzel filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his habeas corpus petition. The appeals court denied the mandamus petition, finding no undue delay based on the current record. The unpublished opinion states that Monzel's petition for habeas corpus relief and request for mandamus to compel a ruling are denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-2258

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Monzel filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his habeas corpus petition. The appeals court denied the mandamus petition, finding no undue delay based on the current record. The unpublished opinion states that Monzel's petition for habeas corpus relief and request for mandamus to compel a ruling are denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    In Re: Michael Monzel, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Monzel filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his habeas corpus petition. The appeals court denied the mandamus petition, finding no undue delay based on the current record. The unpublished opinion states that Monzel's petition for habeas corpus relief and request for mandamus to compel a ruling are denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-2258

    In re:

    MICHAEL MATTHEW MONZEL,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (No. 5:12-hc-02166-F)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2012

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: November 26, 2012

    and

    SHEDD

    and

    FLOYD,

    Circuit

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Matthew Monzel, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Matthew

    Monzel

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in


    ruling on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

    He seeks an

    order from this court directing the district court to act.


    find

    the

    present

    district court.

    record

    does

    not

    reveal

    undue

    delay

    in

    We
    the

    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis and deny the mandamus petition.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like