Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: McDonald V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Paul McDonald petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for a writ of error. The court denied the petition, finding that McDonald did not demonstrate his right to the relief sought. The court also denied McDonald's motions for a jury trial, to place his case in abeyance, to consolidate it with a prior appeal, and to appoint counsel. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6050

    Original Title

    In Re: McDonald v., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Paul McDonald petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for a writ of error. The court denied the petition, finding that McDonald did not demonstrate his right to the relief sought. The court also denied McDonald's motions for a jury trial, to place his case in abeyance, to consolidate it with a prior appeal, and to appoint counsel. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    In Re: McDonald V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Paul McDonald petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for a writ of error. The court denied the petition, finding that McDonald did not demonstrate his right to the relief sought. The court also denied McDonald's motions for a jury trial, to place his case in abeyance, to consolidate it with a prior appeal, and to appoint counsel. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6050

    In Re:

    PAUL MCDONALD,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Error.


    (8:06-cv-00968-PJM)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2007

    Decided:

    June 7, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul McDonald, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul McDonald petitions for a writ of error pursuant to
    28 U.S.C. 1651(a) (2000).

    Because McDonald has not demonstrated

    his right to the relief sought, we deny relief.*

    Accordingly, we

    deny the petition for writ of error. We also deny McDonalds


    motions for a jury trial, to place his case in abeyance, to
    consolidate this case with a prior appeal, and to appoint counsel.
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    See generally, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir.


    1987).
    - 2 -

    You might also like