Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michelle Parham v. Mid Atlantic Baking Company, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Michelle Parham appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination complaint against Mid Atlantic Baking Company under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its September 26, 2011 opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-12-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-2049

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michelle Parham appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination complaint against Mid Atlantic Baking Company under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its September 26, 2011 opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Michelle Parham v. Mid Atlantic Baking Company, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michelle Parham appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination complaint against Mid Atlantic Baking Company under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its September 26, 2011 opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-2049

    MICHELLE PARHAM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MID ATLANTIC BAKING COMPANY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:11-cv-00185-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2011

    Decided:

    December 21, 2011

    Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michelle Parham, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Constantine Themelis,
    LAW OFFICE OF JOHN C. THEMELIS, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michelle

    Parham

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing her complaint of discrimination under the Americans


    with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. 12101-12213 (West 2005 &
    Supp. 2011).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    00185-WDQ

    (D.

    Parham v. Mid Atlantic Baking Co., No. 1:11-cvMd.

    Sept.

    26,

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like