Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shawn Thomas v. Frederick County Gov't, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Shawn Andre Thomas appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Frederick County Government and two judges. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and concurred with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-2261

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Shawn Andre Thomas appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Frederick County Government and two judges. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and concurred with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Shawn Thomas v. Frederick County Gov't, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Shawn Andre Thomas appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Frederick County Government and two judges. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and concurred with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-2261

    SHAWN ANDRE THOMAS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    FREDERICK COUNTY GOVERNMENT; THERESA M. ADAMS, Judge; JOHN
    H. TISDALE, Judge,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:11-cv-02907-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    March 15, 2012

    Decided:

    March 19, 2012

    Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Shawn Andre Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Shawn Andre Thomas appeals the district courts order
    dismissing

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Thomas

    v. Frederick Cnty. Govt, No. 1:11-cv-02907-WDQ (D. Md. Oct. 25,


    2011).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like