Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lamont Parker v. James Knight, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Lamont Delmar Parker's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-08-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6288

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Lamont Delmar Parker's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    Lamont Parker v. James Knight, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Lamont Delmar Parker's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6288

    LAMONT DELMAR PARKER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SHERIFF JAMES KNIGHT; JAIL ADMINISTRATOR G. BULLOCK,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03095-D)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2012

    Decided:

    August 21, 2012

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lamont Delmar Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Baxter Bradburn,


    WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lamont

    Delmar

    Parker

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28


    U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    See Parker v. Knight, No.

    5:10-ct-03095-D (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2011).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like