Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carlos Alford v. Ray Mabus, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Carlos Alford appealed a district court decision dismissing his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1712

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carlos Alford appealed a district court decision dismissing his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Carlos Alford v. Ray Mabus, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlos Alford appealed a district court decision dismissing his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1712

    CARLOS A. ALFORD,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy; W. DEAN PHIEFFER,
    Chairman Board of Corrections; ROBERT D. ZSALMAN, Acting
    Executive Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III,
    Chief District Judge. (7:14-cv-00195-D)

    Submitted:

    October 30, 2015

    Decided:

    November 18, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carlos A. Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Francisco Ramirez,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlos

    A.

    Alford

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Alford v. Mabus, No. 7:14-cv-00195-D (E.D.N.C. June 23,

    2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like