Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • David Miller v. Katy Poole, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Henry Miller's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. Miller's motions to dismiss the defendants' brief, for appointment of counsel, and for injunctive relief were all denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7207

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Henry Miller's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. Miller's motions to dismiss the defendants' brief, for appointment of counsel, and for injunctive relief were all denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    David Miller v. Katy Poole, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of David Henry Miller's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. Miller's motions to dismiss the defendants' brief, for appointment of counsel, and for injunctive relief were all denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7207

    DAVID HENRY MILLER,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    KATY
    POOLE;
    WILLIAM
    BULLARD;
    YOLANDA
    ROBERTS, Blue Unit Supervisor Manager,

    COVINGTON;

    MR.

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
    District Judge. (1:15-cv-00057-CCE-JLW)

    Submitted:

    December 28, 2015

    Decided:

    January 11, 2016

    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Henry Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson,


    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David

    Henry

    Miller

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(g)

    (2012).

    reversible error.

    We

    (M.D.N.C.

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    JLW

    have

    July

    Miller v. Poole, No. 1:15-cv-00057-CCE28,

    2015).

    The

    motions

    to

    dismiss

    defendants informal response brief, for appointment of counsel


    and for injunctive relief are denied.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like