Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kilgore v. Rosenstein, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Cleveland Kilgore's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, which found that Kilgore was not entitled to relief. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7228

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Cleveland Kilgore's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, which found that Kilgore was not entitled to relief. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Kilgore v. Rosenstein, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Cleveland Kilgore's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, which found that Kilgore was not entitled to relief. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7228

    CLEVELAND WINSTON KILGORE, JR.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, United States Attorney; BARBARA S.
    SKALLA, United States Assistant Attorney; MICHELE WALLS
    SARTORI, United States Assistant Attorney; UNIDENTIFIED
    SECRET SERVICE OFFICERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:10-cv-01768-RDB).

    Submitted:

    January 18, 2011

    Decided:

    January 27, 2011

    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Cleveland Winston Kilgore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Cleveland Winston Kilgore, Jr., appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his civil complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Kilgore

    v. Rosenstein, No. 1:10-cv-01768-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2010).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like