Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lacy Williams, Jr. v. State of North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order dismissed one but not all of the claims in a habeas corpus petition filed by Lacy Lee Williams, Jr. under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As the district court's order was neither final nor appealable, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Oral arguments were dispensed with as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the submitted materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6067

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order dismissed one but not all of the claims in a habeas corpus petition filed by Lacy Lee Williams, Jr. under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As the district court's order was neither final nor appealable, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Oral arguments were dispensed with as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the submitted materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lacy Williams, Jr. v. State of North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order dismissed one but not all of the claims in a habeas corpus petition filed by Lacy Lee Williams, Jr. under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As the district court's order was neither final nor appealable, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Oral arguments were dispensed with as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the submitted materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6067

    LACY LEE WILLIAMS, JR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:15-hc-02069-BO)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2016

    Decided:

    June 1, 2016

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER, and FLOYD, Circuit


    Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lacy Lee Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lacy

    Lee

    Williams,

    Jr.,

    seeks

    to

    appeal

    the

    district

    courts order dismissing one, but not all, of the claims he


    filed in his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2012) petition.

    This court may

    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291


    (2012),

    and

    certain

    interlocutory

    and

    collateral

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial


    Indus.

    Loan

    Williams

    Corp.,

    seeks

    to

    337

    U.S.

    appeal

    541,

    is

    545-46

    neither

    (1949).
    final

    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.


    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    The

    order

    order

    nor

    an

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like