Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Luis Velarde v. John McDonald, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Luis Armando Velarde appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to John McDonald and dismissing Velarde's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6356

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Luis Armando Velarde appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to John McDonald and dismissing Velarde's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Luis Velarde v. John McDonald, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Luis Armando Velarde appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to John McDonald and dismissing Velarde's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6356

    LUIS A. VELARDE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN MCDONALD,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03222-D)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2014

    Decided:

    June 3, 2014

    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Luis Armando Velarde, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    Raleigh,
    Appellee.

    Peter Andrew Regulski,


    North
    Carolina,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Luis

    Armando

    Velarde

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order granting John McDonalds motion for summary judgment and


    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) civil rights action for
    failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
    the record and find no reversible error.
    for

    the

    reasons

    McDonald,

    No.

    We dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    stated

    by

    the

    5:12-ct-03222-D
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    Accordingly, we affirm

    district

    court.

    (E.D.N.C.
    because

    presented

    in

    We have reviewed

    Feb.

    Velarde
    24,

    v.

    2014).

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like