Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Saad Usman Lodhi v. Fairfax County, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Saad Usman Lodhi in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Fairfax County. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-2564

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Saad Usman Lodhi in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Fairfax County. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Saad Usman Lodhi v. Fairfax County, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Saad Usman Lodhi in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Fairfax County. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court also dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-2564

    SAAD USMAN LODHI,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    FAIRFAX COUNTY, Board of Supervisors/Virginia,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-01108-JCC-JFA)

    Submitted:

    March 26, 2013

    Decided:

    March 28, 2013

    Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Saad Usman Lodhi, Appellant Pro Se.


    Sarah Wallace Townes,
    COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Saad Usman Lodhi appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Lodhi v. Fairfax Cnty., No. 1:12-cv-01108-JCC-JFA (E.D.

    Va. Dec. 21, 2012).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like