Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Caballero, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Cesar Ruben Caballero, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Caballero a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Caballero failed to present grounds for vacating his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7293

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cesar Ruben Caballero, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Caballero a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Caballero failed to present grounds for vacating his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Caballero, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cesar Ruben Caballero, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Caballero a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Caballero failed to present grounds for vacating his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7293

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CESAR RUBEN CABALLERO, JR., a/k/a Cesar Ruben
    Cabellero,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-92-200-N, CA-96-1131)
    Submitted:

    November 20, 1997

    Decided:

    December 11, 1997

    Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Cesar Ruben Caballero, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Caballero, Nos. CR-92-200-N; CA-96-1131
    (E.D. Va. June 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like