Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Norris Leo Dangler v. Cleopatra Campbell, Individually, Andrew Sonner, Individually, 914 F.2d 247, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Norris Leo Dangler under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decides oral arguments are not necessary as the facts and legal arguments are already adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 914 F.2d 247 Docket: 88-7669

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Norris Leo Dangler under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decides oral arguments are not necessary as the facts and legal arguments are already adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    19 views2 pages

    Norris Leo Dangler v. Cleopatra Campbell, Individually, Andrew Sonner, Individually, 914 F.2d 247, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Norris Leo Dangler under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decides oral arguments are not necessary as the facts and legal arguments are already adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    914 F.

    2d 247
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Norris Leo DANGLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Cleopatra CAMPBELL, Individually, Andrew Sonner,
    Individually, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-7669.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 16, 1988.
    Decided Sept. 18, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge. (CA-88-1403-R)
    Norris Leo Dangler, appellant pro se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Norris Leo Dangler appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Dangler v. Campbell, CA-88-1403-R (D.Md.
    May 18, 1988.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court, and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like