Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Nelda A. Perkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Prince George's County Government and others which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 77 F.3d 470 Docket: 95-2602

    Original Title

    Nelda A. Perkins v. Prince George's County Government Prince George's County Council Animal Control Commission Ronald Simons Jan Marks Shellie Moore Nancy R. Reams, Dr. Michael Alteri, 77 F.3d 470, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nelda A. Perkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Prince George's County Government and others which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nelda A. Perkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Prince George's County Government and others which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    77 F.

    3d 470

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Nelda A. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; Prince
    George's County
    Council; Animal Control Commission; Ronald
    Simons; Jan Marks; Shellie Moore;
    Nancy R. Reams, Dr.; Michael
    Alteri, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-2602.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 15, 1996.

    Nelda A. Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Daniel Wallace, COUNTY


    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Perkins v. Prince George's County Gov't, No. CA-93-1305DKC (D.Md. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like