Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3d 119
Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1994) complaint and denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)
motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Overby v. Hester, No. CA-94-787-2 (E.D.
Va. June 10, 1996 & July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.