Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ford v. Turlington, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the habeas petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7832

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Ford v. Turlington, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a district court's denial of a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7832

    STEPHEN EDWARD FORD,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JACK V. TURLINGTON,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CA-97-465-5-F)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1998

    Decided:

    May 26, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Stephen Edward Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. See Ford v. Turlington, No. CA-97-465-5-F
    (E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like