Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mary Lee Lynch, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee, 885 F.2d 865, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The court dismissed an appeal by Mary Lee Lynch, a claimant against A.H. Robins Co., the manufacturer of the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device. The court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the record did not show that Lynch filed a timely appeal from an appealable order related to the Robins bankruptcy reorganization plan. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-09-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 885 F.2d 865 Docket: 89-2112

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The court dismissed an appeal by Mary Lee Lynch, a claimant against A.H. Robins Co., the manufacturer of the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device. The court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the record did not show that Lynch filed a timely appeal from an appealable order related to the Robins bankruptcy reorganization plan. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Mary Lee Lynch, Claimant-Appellant v. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellee, 885 F.2d 865, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The court dismissed an appeal by Mary Lee Lynch, a claimant against A.H. Robins Co., the manufacturer of the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device. The court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the record did not show that Lynch filed a timely appeal from an appealable order related to the Robins bankruptcy reorganization plan. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    885 F.

    2d 865
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Mary Lee LYNCH, Claimant-Appellant,
    v.
    A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DebtorAppellee.
    No. 89-2112.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 21, 1989.
    Decided Sept. 19, 1989.

    Mary Lee Lynch, appellant pro se.


    Linda Jenkins Thomason, Mays & Valentine, Michael Lewis Cook,
    Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, for appellee.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, AND CHAPMAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Mary Lee Lynch, a Dalkon Shield claimant, filed a notice of appeal on March
    21, 1988 in connection with the A.H. Robins Co. Chapter 11 bankruptcy
    reorganization plan. As the record does not show that this was a timely appeal
    from any appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would
    not significantly aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED.

    You might also like