Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Herron, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Glenn D. Herron appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Herron's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Herron was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7056

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Glenn D. Herron appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Herron's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Herron was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Herron, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Glenn D. Herron appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied Herron's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Herron was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7056

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GLENN D. HERRON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-93-44, CA-97-629-2)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 1998

    Decided:

    December 2, 1998

    Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Aaron Peter Buda, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Glenn D. Herron seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Herrons motion for
    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Herron, Nos. CR-9344; CA-97-629-2 (M.D.N.C. May 18, 1998). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like