Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Greg Hatcher, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Greg Hatcher's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the motion. The appeals court thus denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-12-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7365

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Greg Hatcher's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the motion. The appeals court thus denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Greg Hatcher, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Greg Hatcher's appeal of a district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the motion. The appeals court thus denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7365

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GREG HATCHER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-96-12, CA-98-105-1)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 1999

    Decided:

    December 30, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Greg Hatcher, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Greg Hatcher seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

    ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    See United States v. Hatcher, No. CR-96-12; CA-98-105-1

    (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 14, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument be-

    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like