Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Burrell v. Powers, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Charles Davis Burrell filed a § 1983 complaint against David A. Powers, III and Nikas & Powers Law Firm, which was denied by the district court. 2) Burrell appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-2368

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Charles Davis Burrell filed a § 1983 complaint against David A. Powers, III and Nikas & Powers Law Firm, which was denied by the district court. 2) Burrell appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Burrell v. Powers, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Charles Davis Burrell filed a § 1983 complaint against David A. Powers, III and Nikas & Powers Law Firm, which was denied by the district court. 2) Burrell appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-2368

    CHARLES DAVIS BURRELL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DAVID A. POWERS, III; NIKAS & POWERS LAW FIRM,
    INCORPORATED,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-614-3)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2000

    Decided:

    March 1, 2000

    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Davis Burrell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Davis Burrell appeals the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    of the district court. See Burrell v. Powers, No. CA-99-614-3 (E.D.


    Va. Sept. 8, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like