Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Jonathan Johnson V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views2 pages
    1) Jonathan Donnell Johnson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his motions under Rule 35(a) and Rule 59(e). 2) The court reviewed the district court docket and found that on May 3, 2013, the district court entered an order resolving the relevant motions in the closed case. 3) Because the district court recently addressed Johnson's motions, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1341

    Original Title

    In Re: Jonathan Johnson v., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Jonathan Donnell Johnson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his motions under Rule 35(a) and Rule 59(e). 2) The court reviewed the district court docket and found that on May 3, 2013, the district court entered an order resolving the relevant motions in the closed case. 3) Because the district court recently addressed Johnson's motions, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    23 views2 pages

    In Re: Jonathan Johnson V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Jonathan Donnell Johnson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his motions under Rule 35(a) and Rule 59(e). 2) The court reviewed the district court docket and found that on May 3, 2013, the district court entered an order resolving the relevant motions in the closed case. 3) Because the district court recently addressed Johnson's motions, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1341

    In Re:

    JONATHAN DONNELL JOHNSON,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (3:00-cr-00136-GCM-3)

    Submitted:

    June 19, 2013

    Decided:

    July 12, 2013

    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jonathan Donnell Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jonathan

    Donnell

    Johnson

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting


    on his motions under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
    59(e).

    He seeks an order from this court directing the district

    court to act on the motions.


    docket

    reveals

    that

    the

    Our review of the district courts

    district

    court

    entered

    an

    order

    on

    May 3, 2013, that resolves the relevant motions in this closed


    case.

    Accordingly,

    because

    the

    district

    court

    has

    recently

    addressed Johnsons motions, we deny the mandamus petition as


    moot.

    We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like